Hi Cyrille,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Le 01/04/2016 22:27, Brian Norris a écrit :
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> >> Just a general remark: maybe reading the JEDEC ID is not a so reliable
> >> mean to
> >> discover
Hi Cyrille,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Le 01/04/2016 22:27, Brian Norris a écrit :
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> >> Just a general remark: maybe reading the JEDEC ID is not a so reliable
> >> mean to
> >> discover
Hi Brian,
Le 01/04/2016 22:27, Brian Norris a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> [...]
>>> But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
>>> s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
>>> Register,
Hi Brian,
Le 01/04/2016 22:27, Brian Norris a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> [...]
>>> But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
>>> s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
>>> Register,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [...]
> > But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
> > s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
> > Register, so presumably *some* version of s25fl064k should support
> >
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [...]
> > But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
> > s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
> > Register, so presumably *some* version of s25fl064k should support
> >
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [...]
> > But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
> > s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
> > Register, so presumably *some* version of s25fl064k should support
> >
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:47:48PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [...]
> > But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
> > s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
> > Register, so presumably *some* version of s25fl064k should support
> >
Hi all,
[...]
> But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
> s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
> Register, so presumably *some* version of s25fl064k should support
> write_sr(nor, 0) to unlock it at boot...
>
> If Felix's initial report is
Hi all,
[...]
> But this is interesting: I see the latest datasheet for Spansion
> s25fl064k says it supports the Block Protect bits in the Status
> Register, so presumably *some* version of s25fl064k should support
> write_sr(nor, 0) to unlock it at boot...
>
> If Felix's initial report is
On 03/28/2016 10:56 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:52:51AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> On 03/26/2016 07:57 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
and
On 03/28/2016 10:56 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:52:51AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> On 03/26/2016 07:57 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
and
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:52:51AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 03/26/2016 07:57 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> >> and they don't support the same features.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:52:51AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 03/26/2016 07:57 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> >> and they don't support the same features.
On 03/26/2016 07:57 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
>> and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
>> seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k.
On 03/26/2016 07:57 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
>> and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
>> seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k.
On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
> seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k. Unfortunately, we
> don't currently have a way to
On 12/15/2015 07:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
> seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k. Unfortunately, we
> don't currently have a way to
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 01:03 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-06 01:02, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:29:28PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> > Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same
On 2016-01-06 01:02, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:29:28PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
>> > and they don't support the same features.
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:29:28PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> > and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
> > seems to break read
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:29:28PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> > and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
> > seems to break read
On 2016-01-06 01:02, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:29:28PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
>> > and they don't support the same features.
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 01:03 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-06 01:02, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:29:28PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> > Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
> seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k. Unfortunately, we
> don't currently
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
> and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
> seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k. Unfortunately, we
> don't currently
Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k. Unfortunately, we
don't currently have a way to differentiate these Spansion and Winbond
parts, so rather
Spansion and Winbond have occasionally used the same manufacturer ID,
and they don't support the same features. Particularly, writing SR=0
seems to break read access for Spansion's s25fl064k. Unfortunately, we
don't currently have a way to differentiate these Spansion and Winbond
parts, so rather
28 matches
Mail list logo
