Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-02-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
Hi, Find below the interdiff of the (minor) edits I've done to the series, before applying them to tip:sched/urgent. I've also tidied up some of the changelogs. Nothing earth-shattering. Thanks, Ingo => arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +- arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 2 +- ar

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-02-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > I indeed have a git tree setup. The URL is in the pull request I sent you this > morning. Yeah, too much email, so I hadn't gotten to that yet... > But I favor letting it go through Ingo's scheduler tree and benefit from the > extra

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-02-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > - On Feb 5, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Linus Torvalds > torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, I wanted to apply these bits later today with some minor edits - > >> unless > >> you > >> are going

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-02-05 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Feb 5, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> Yeah, I wanted to apply these bits later today with some minor edits - unless >> you >> are going to pull it directly. > > I have not pulled yet, I w

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-02-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Yeah, I wanted to apply these bits later today with some minor edits - > > unless you > > are going to pull it directly. > > I have not pulled yet, I wanted to check. But I do want to get it merged. > > It g

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-02-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Yeah, I wanted to apply these bits later today with some minor edits - unless > you > are going to pull it directly. I have not pulled yet, I wanted to check. But I do want to get it merged. It gets easier for me if I can just pull. Mathie

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-02-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ingo/Peter/Thomas, > can you comment on this? I'd like to get this moving one way or > another, rather than just hold it back forever. > > I _think_ all the concerns were resolved, no? Yeah, I wanted to apply these bits later today with some minor edits - unless you

[PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-01-29 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas, Here is the updated membarrier patch series following Acked-by from Peter. It would be appreciated of those can go through the scheduler tree for the 4.16 merge window. Highlights: "powerpc: membarrier: Skip memory barrier in switch_mm()" takes care of a TODO that was le

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-01-29 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:57:22AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas, > > Here is the updated membarrier patch series Aside from the horribly long symbols and the comment bike-shedding, I think its ok. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-01-29 Thread Linus Torvalds
Ingo/Peter/Thomas, can you comment on this? I'd like to get this moving one way or another, rather than just hold it back forever. I _think_ all the concerns were resolved, no? Linus On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas, > > Here is t

Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-01-29 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi Ingo, Hi Peter, Please let me know if you find anything that prevents you from integrating this patchset into the scheduler tree. Thanks, Mathieu - On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote: > Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas, > > Here is the updated

[PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-01-23 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas, Here is the updated membarrier patch series following review from Andy. It would be appreciated of those can go through the scheduler tree for the 4.16 merge window. Patch "x86: Implement sync_core_before_usermode" got a reviewed-by from Thomas, but I removed the tag fol

[PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-01-17 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas, Here is the updated membarrier patch series following review from Thomas. It would be appreciated of those can go through the scheduler tree for the 4.16 merge window. Highlights: "powerpc: membarrier: Skip memory barrier in switch_mm()" takes care of a TODO that was lef

[PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2018-01-10 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi Ingo, Hi Peter, Here are the membarrier patch series I would like to upstream for 4.16. It would be appreciated of those can go through the tip tree. Highlights: "Fix: membarrier: add missing preempt off around smp_call_function_many" is in the series mainly because the following patches appl

[RFC PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

2017-12-22 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi, I decided to split the membarrier updates from the rseq patchset, and send it separately so each discussion can happen in different threads. This series includes a fix for membarrier private expedited, which should be merged into 4.15-rc and backported to 4.14. The fix has also been sent sepa