Re: [PATCH for review] [26/48] i386: hpet assumes boot cpu is 0

Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I fixed this in x86_64. Looks like the kind of thing that will break voyager > on i386. > All those Voyagers with hpet? J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

[PATCH for review] [26/48] i386: hpet assumes boot cpu is 0

From: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I fixed this in x86_64. Looks like the kind of thing that will break voyager on i386. Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL

[PATCH for review] [26/48] i386: hpet assumes boot cpu is 0

From: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] I fixed this in x86_64. Looks like the kind of thing that will break voyager on i386. Signed-off-by: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH for review] [26/48] i386: hpet assumes boot cpu is 0

Andi Kleen wrote: From: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] I fixed this in x86_64. Looks like the kind of thing that will break voyager on i386. All those Voyagers with hpet? J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL