On 6/16/20 8:16 AM, js1...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim
>
> With synchronous IO swap device, swap-in is directly handled in fault
> code. Since IO cost notation isn't added there, with synchronous IO swap
> device, LRU balancing could be wrongly biased. Fix it to count it
> in fault
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:16:44PM +0900, js1...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim
>
> With synchronous IO swap device, swap-in is directly handled in fault
> code. Since IO cost notation isn't added there, with synchronous IO swap
> device, LRU balancing could be wrongly biased. Fix it to
From: Joonsoo Kim
With synchronous IO swap device, swap-in is directly handled in fault
code. Since IO cost notation isn't added there, with synchronous IO swap
device, LRU balancing could be wrongly biased. Fix it to count it
in fault code.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim
---
mm/memory.c | 8
3 matches
Mail list logo