On 22/07/2019 14:44, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Szabolcs Nagy:
>
>> (note: in musl these ioctl macros are in sys/ioctl.h
>> which is not a posix header so namespace rules are
>> less strict than for sys/socket.h and users tend to
>> include it for ioctl())
>
> can be confusing because some of the
* Szabolcs Nagy:
> (note: in musl these ioctl macros are in sys/ioctl.h
> which is not a posix header so namespace rules are
> less strict than for sys/socket.h and users tend to
> include it for ioctl())
can be confusing because some of the constants may depend
on types that aren't declared by
On 22/07/2019 12:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:31 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> Historically, (which is included from )
>> provided ioctl operations for sockets. User code accessed them
>> through . The kernel UAPI headers have removed these
>> definitions in favor of .
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:31 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Historically, (which is included from )
> provided ioctl operations for sockets. User code accessed them
> through . The kernel UAPI headers have removed these
> definitions in favor of . This commit makes them
> available via again.
Historically, (which is included from )
provided ioctl operations for sockets. User code accessed them
through . The kernel UAPI headers have removed these
definitions in favor of . This commit makes them
available via again.
[[[
This is related to this thread:
From: Sergei Trofimovich
Subj
5 matches
Mail list logo
