RE: [PATCH kernel v8 2/4] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER

2017-04-05 Thread Wang, Wei W
On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 12:31 PM, Wei Wang wrote: > On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 11:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:31:36AM +, Wang, Wei W wrote: > > > On Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:09 PM Wei Wang wrote: > > > > The implementation of the current virtio-balloon

RE: [PATCH kernel v8 2/4] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER

2017-04-04 Thread Wang, Wei W
On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 11:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:31:36AM +, Wang, Wei W wrote: > > On Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:09 PM Wei Wang wrote: > > > The implementation of the current virtio-balloon is not very > > > efficient, because the ballooned pages are

Re: [PATCH kernel v8 2/4] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER

2017-04-04 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:31:36AM +, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:09 PM Wei Wang wrote: > > The implementation of the current virtio-balloon is not very efficient, > > because > > the ballooned pages are transferred to the host one by one. Here is the > > breakdown of th

RE: [PATCH kernel v8 2/4] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER

2017-04-04 Thread Wang, Wei W
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:09 PM Wei Wang wrote: > The implementation of the current virtio-balloon is not very efficient, > because > the ballooned pages are transferred to the host one by one. Here is the > breakdown of the time in percentage spent on each step of the balloon > inflating > p

[PATCH kernel v8 2/4] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER

2017-03-16 Thread Wei Wang
From: Liang Li The implementation of the current virtio-balloon is not very efficient, because the ballooned pages are transferred to the host one by one. Here is the breakdown of the time in percentage spent on each step of the balloon inflating process (inflating 7GB of an 8GB idle guest). 1)