On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:09 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-01-02 10:03:59, Yi Yang wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 00:20 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > /proc/acpi/wakeup is also case-sensitive, case-insensitive is better.
> > >
> > > Why?
> > A user uses device bus
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:09 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-01-02 10:03:59, Yi Yang wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 00:20 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > /proc/acpi/wakeup is also case-sensitive, case-insensitive is better.
> > >
> > > Why?
> > A user uses device bus
On Wed 2008-01-02 10:03:59, Yi Yang wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 00:20 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > /proc/acpi/wakeup is also case-sensitive, case-insensitive is better.
> >
> > Why?
> A user uses device bus id like 'C093' to enable or disable wakeup of the
> device, for example
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 00:20 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > /proc/acpi/wakeup is also case-sensitive, case-insensitive is better.
>
> Why?
A user uses device bus id like 'C093' to enable or disable wakeup of the
device, for example
echo "C093" > /proc/acpi/wakeup
but i think "c093" shoul
Hi!
> /proc/acpi/wakeup is also case-sensitive, case-insensitive is better.
Why?
> In addtion, this patch appends a new column 'PCI ID' to /proc/acpi/wakeup
> , the user can use it to get the corresponding device name very
> conveniently because PCI ID is a unique identifier and platform-indepen
Subject: ACPI: Correct wakeup set error and append a new column PCI ID
From: Yi Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The user can't get any information when echo an invalid value to
/proc/acpi/wakeup although it is failed, but the user can set
/proc/acpi/wakeup successfully if echo an value whose prefix is a
6 matches
Mail list logo