Hi Jiada
Thank you for your patch
> lockdep warns us that priv->lock and k->k_lock can cause a
> deadlock when after acquire of k->k_lock, process is interrupted
> by src, while in another routine of src .init, k->k_lock is
> acquired with priv->lock held.
>
> This patch avoids a potential dea
lockdep warns us that priv->lock and k->k_lock can cause a
deadlock when after acquire of k->k_lock, process is interrupted
by src, while in another routine of src .init, k->k_lock is
acquired with priv->lock held.
This patch avoids a potential deadlock by not calling soc_device_match()
in SRC .in
2 matches
Mail list logo
