Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

Hi Jeff, Thanks for your reply. Comments below. On 04/30/2014 02:15 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:50:23 +0200 > "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" wrote: [...] >> # The record locks described above are associated with the process >> # (unlike the open file

Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

Hi Jeff, I'll follow up on your reply in a moment. But, in the meantime, you missed a question of mine: >>> +.TP >>> +.BR F_OFD_SETLK " (\fIstruct flock *\fP)" >>> +Acquire an open file description lock (when >>> +.I l_type >>> +is >>> +.B F_RDLCK >>> +or >>> +.BR F_WRLCK ) >>> +or release an

Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:50:23 +0200 "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" wrote: > [CC += linux-man] > > Jeff, > > Thanks very much for writing this patch! > > I've taken your patch into a branch and add a number of details. I have > one or two questions below. > > On 04/29/2014 08:51 PM, Jeff

Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

[CC += linux-man] Jeff, Thanks very much for writing this patch! I've taken your patch into a branch and add a number of details. I have one or two questions below. On 04/29/2014 08:51 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > --- > man2/fcntl.2 | 112 >

Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

[CC += linux-man] Jeff, Thanks very much for writing this patch! I've taken your patch into a branch and add a number of details. I have one or two questions below. On 04/29/2014 08:51 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton jlay...@poochiereds.net --- man2/fcntl.2 | 112

Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:50:23 +0200 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) mtk.manpa...@gmail.com wrote: [CC += linux-man] Jeff, Thanks very much for writing this patch! I've taken your patch into a branch and add a number of details. I have one or two questions below. On 04/29/2014 08:51 PM,

Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

Hi Jeff, I'll follow up on your reply in a moment. But, in the meantime, you missed a question of mine: +.TP +.BR F_OFD_SETLK (\fIstruct flock *\fP) +Acquire an open file description lock (when +.I l_type +is +.B F_RDLCK +or +.BR F_WRLCK ) +or release an open file description lock

Re: [PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

Hi Jeff, Thanks for your reply. Comments below. On 04/30/2014 02:15 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:50:23 +0200 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) mtk.manpa...@gmail.com wrote: [...] # The record locks described above are associated with the process # (unlike the open

[PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- man2/fcntl.2 | 112 +-- 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man2/fcntl.2 b/man2/fcntl.2 index d0154a6d9f42..8d119dfec24c 100644 --- a/man2/fcntl.2 +++ b/man2/fcntl.2 @@ -191,6

[PATCH man-pages v1] fcntl.2: update manpage with verbiage about open file description locks

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton jlay...@poochiereds.net --- man2/fcntl.2 | 112 +-- 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man2/fcntl.2 b/man2/fcntl.2 index d0154a6d9f42..8d119dfec24c 100644 --- a/man2/fcntl.2 +++