Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>> What would make sense is (what I meant when I said swap counted
>>> along with RSS) not to count pages out and back in as they are
>>> go out to swap and back in, just keep count of instantiated pages
>>>
>> I
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > What would make sense is (what I meant when I said swap counted
> > along with RSS) not to count pages out and back in as they are
> > go out to swap and back in, just keep count of instantiated pages
> >
>
> I am not sure ho
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>> More fundamentally, it looks like any container brought over its limit in
>>> unuse_pte will abort swapoff: that doesn't doesn't seem "contained" to me.
>>> Maybe unuse_pte should just let containers go over t
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> rc4-mm1's memory-controller-memory-accounting-v7.patch broke swapoff:
> it extended unuse_pte_range's boolean "found" return code to allow an
> error return too; but ended up returning found (1) as an error.
> Replace that by success (0) before it gets to the upper level.
>
>
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > More fundamentally, it looks like any container brought over its limit in
> > unuse_pte will abort swapoff: that doesn't doesn't seem "contained" to me.
> > Maybe unuse_pte should just let containers go over their limits without
> >
rc4-mm1's memory-controller-memory-accounting-v7.patch broke swapoff:
it extended unuse_pte_range's boolean "found" return code to allow an
error return too; but ended up returning found (1) as an error.
Replace that by success (0) before it gets to the upper level.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[E
6 matches
Mail list logo
