Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 21:57:06 -0800 you wrote:
> When sending a packet, we will prepend it with an LAPB header.
> This modifies the shared parts of a cloned skb, so we should copy the
> skb rather than just clone it, before we pr
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:25:17 -0800 Xie He wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:42 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:14:31 -0800 Xie He wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:10 AM Julian Wiedmann
> > > wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> > > Calling "skb_cow_head" before we call "skb_c
From: Xie He
> Sent: 01 February 2021 16:15
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:10 AM Julian Wiedmann wrote:
> >
> > This sounds a bit like you want skb_cow_head() ... ?
>
> Calling "skb_cow_head" before we call "skb_clone" would indeed solve
> the problem of writes to our clones affecting clones in ot
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:42 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:14:31 -0800 Xie He wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:10 AM Julian Wiedmann wrote:
> > > This sounds a bit like you want skb_cow_head() ... ?
> >
> > Calling "skb_cow_head" before we call "skb_clone" would indeed solv
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:14:31 -0800 Xie He wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:10 AM Julian Wiedmann wrote:
> > This sounds a bit like you want skb_cow_head() ... ?
>
> Calling "skb_cow_head" before we call "skb_clone" would indeed solve
> the problem of writes to our clones affecting clones in oth
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:10 AM Julian Wiedmann wrote:
>
> This sounds a bit like you want skb_cow_head() ... ?
Calling "skb_cow_head" before we call "skb_clone" would indeed solve
the problem of writes to our clones affecting clones in other parts of
the system. But since we are still writing to
On 01.02.21 06:57, Xie He wrote:
> When sending a packet, we will prepend it with an LAPB header.
> This modifies the shared parts of a cloned skb, so we should copy the
> skb rather than just clone it, before we prepend the header.
>
> In "Documentation/networking/driver.rst" (the 2nd point), it
On 2021-02-01 11:49, Xie He wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:05 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
What kind of packages do you mean are corrupted?
ETH_P_X25 or ETH_P_HDLC?
I mean ETH_P_X25. I was using "lapbether.c" to test so there was no
ETH_P_HDLC.
I have also sent a patch here in the past tha
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:05 AM Martin Schiller wrote:
>
> What kind of packages do you mean are corrupted?
> ETH_P_X25 or ETH_P_HDLC?
I mean ETH_P_X25. I was using "lapbether.c" to test so there was no ETH_P_HDLC.
> I have also sent a patch here in the past that addressed corrupted
> ETH_P_X25 f
On 2021-02-01 06:57, Xie He wrote:
When sending a packet, we will prepend it with an LAPB header.
This modifies the shared parts of a cloned skb, so we should copy the
skb rather than just clone it, before we prepend the header.
In "Documentation/networking/driver.rst" (the 2nd point), it states
When sending a packet, we will prepend it with an LAPB header.
This modifies the shared parts of a cloned skb, so we should copy the
skb rather than just clone it, before we prepend the header.
In "Documentation/networking/driver.rst" (the 2nd point), it states
that drivers shouldn't modify the sh
11 matches
Mail list logo
