On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:25:42PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.20 15:03, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 02:38:37PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Before commit c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support"),
if a G2H transport was loaded (e.g. virtio
On 19.11.20 15:03, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 02:38:37PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Before commit c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support"),
if a G2H transport was loaded (e.g. virtio transport), every packets
was forwarded to the host, regardless of the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 02:38:37PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Before commit c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support"),
> if a G2H transport was loaded (e.g. virtio transport), every packets
> was forwarded to the host, regardless of the destination CID.
> The H2G transports
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:38:37 +0100 you wrote:
> Before commit c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support"),
> if a G2H transport was loaded (e.g. virtio transport), every packets
> was forwarded to the host, regardless
Before commit c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support"),
if a G2H transport was loaded (e.g. virtio transport), every packets
was forwarded to the host, regardless of the destination CID.
The H2G transports implemented until then (vhost-vsock, VMCI) always
responded with an error, if
5 matches
Mail list logo
