On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:14:26 -0800 Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> Zheng Yongjun wrote:
>
> > When kzalloc failed, should return ENOMEM rather than ENOBUFS.
>
> All these patches have the same subject and description, couldn't they
> just be part of a single series with a good cover letter?
Agreed.
Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> When kzalloc failed, should return ENOMEM rather than ENOBUFS.
All these patches have the same subject and description, couldn't they
just be part of a single series with a good cover letter?
I'm not saying make them a single patch, because that is bad for
bisection, but
When kzalloc failed, should return ENOMEM rather than ENOBUFS.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun
---
net/decnet/dn_dev.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
index 15d42353f1a3..50e375dcd5bd 100644
---
When kalloc or kmemdup failed, should return ENOMEM rather than ENOBUF.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun
---
net/mpls/af_mpls.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
index f2868a8a50c3..7e73611c48dd 100644
---
4 matches
Mail list logo