From: Veaceslav Falico
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:41:56 +0100
> There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
> (0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.
>
> To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
> ETH_P_LOOPBACK that
From: Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:41:56 +0100
There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
(0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.
To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
Hi,
There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
(0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.
To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
ETH_P_LOOPBACK that contains the correct id - 0x9000.
CC: Jay Vosburgh
CC: Andy
Hi,
There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
(0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.
To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
ETH_P_LOOPBACK that contains the correct id - 0x9000.
CC: Jay Vosburgh fu...@us.ibm.com
4 matches
Mail list logo