From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:04:28 -0800
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 14:58 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Joe Perches
>> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:41:09 -0800
>>
>> Converting these locations to consistently use eth_*() is fine,
>> but then "optimizing" a 6 by memset for configu
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 14:58 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches
> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:41:09 -0800
>
> > Until such time as the linux crosstools compilers are updated,
> > (they seem stuck on 4.6.3 from 3 years ago)
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
> > I think the s
From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:41:09 -0800
> Until such time as the linux crosstools compilers are updated,
> (they seem stuck on 4.6.3 from 3 years ago)
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
> I think the series is a trivial, small improvement.
You are even admitting that e
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:41 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Until such time as the linux crosstools compilers are updated,
> (they seem stuck on 4.6.3 from 3 years ago)
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
> I think the series is a trivial, small improvement.
>
> I believe that's the only "a
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 14:27 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches
> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:07:51 -0800
> > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>
> >> > At least for arm gcc 4.6.3, it emits different code
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:42:05 -0800
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> At least for arm gcc 4.6.3, it emits different code
>> for net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.o
>
> Then it looks like arm gcc or arm linux memset() should be improved.
>
> Tracking all memset(
From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:07:51 -0800
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>> > At least for arm gcc 4.6.3, it emits different code
>> > for net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.o
>>
>> Then it looks like arm gcc or
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > At least for arm gcc 4.6.3, it emits different code
> > for net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.o
>
> Then it looks like arm gcc or arm linux memset() should be improved.
Perhaps you can take that
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> At least for arm gcc 4.6.3, it emits different code
> for net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.o
Then it looks like arm gcc or arm linux memset() should be improved.
Tracking all memset(x, y, 6) and replace them by some custom version
seems not very generic t
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 05:19 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:54 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Make the memset possibly more efficient with the appropriate
> > CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS #ifdef
[]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/etherdevice.h b/include/linux/etherdevi
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:54 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Make the memset possibly more efficient with the appropriate
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS #ifdef
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
> ---
> include/linux/etherdevice.h | 12 +++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletio
Make the memset possibly more efficient with the appropriate
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS #ifdef
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
include/linux/etherdevice.h | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/etherdevice.h b/include/linux/ether
12 matches
Mail list logo
