Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:31:49 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:19:26PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > Do not let the drivers access the ds->ports static array directly
> > while there is a dsa_to_port helper for this purpose.
> >
> > At the same time, un-const t
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:19:26PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Do not let the drivers access the ds->ports static array directly
> while there is a dsa_to_port helper for this purpose.
>
> At the same time, un-const this helper since the SJA1105 driver
> assigns the priv member of the returned
On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Do not let the drivers access the ds->ports static array directly
> while there is a dsa_to_port helper for this purpose.
>
> At the same time, un-const this helper since the SJA1105 driver
> assigns the priv member of the returned dsa_port structu
Do not let the drivers access the ds->ports static array directly
while there is a dsa_to_port helper for this purpose.
At the same time, un-const this helper since the SJA1105 driver
assigns the priv member of the returned dsa_port structure.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
---
drivers/net/dsa/b
4 matches
Mail list logo