On 4/15/2021 2:59 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:43:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But
>>> there are boards, esp. with many ports,
Am 2021-04-15 23:59, schrieb Rob Herring:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:43:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But
> there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:43:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But
> > there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only have a base MAC
> > address stored. Thus
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But
> there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only have a base MAC
> address stored. Thus we need to have a way to provide an offset per
> network device.
We
It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But
there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only have a base MAC
address stored. Thus we need to have a way to provide an offset per
network device.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle
---
5 matches
Mail list logo