Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: add nvmem-mac-address-offset property

2021-04-15 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 4/15/2021 2:59 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:43:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: >>> It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But >>> there are boards, esp. with many ports,

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: add nvmem-mac-address-offset property

2021-04-15 Thread Michael Walle
Am 2021-04-15 23:59, schrieb Rob Herring: On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:43:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But > there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: add nvmem-mac-address-offset property

2021-04-15 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:43:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But > > there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only have a base MAC > > address stored. Thus

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: add nvmem-mac-address-offset property

2021-04-14 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But > there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only have a base MAC > address stored. Thus we need to have a way to provide an offset per > network device. We

[PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: add nvmem-mac-address-offset property

2021-04-14 Thread Michael Walle
It is already possible to read the MAC address via a NVMEM provider. But there are boards, esp. with many ports, which only have a base MAC address stored. Thus we need to have a way to provide an offset per network device. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle ---