On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:09:58 -0700
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
> > guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
> >
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:09:58 -0700
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
> > guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
David Miller writes:
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:40:06 +0100
>
>> Eric Dumazet writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as
David Miller writes:
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:40:06 +0100
>
>> Eric Dumazet writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
guarantees (see the comment in
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:40:06 +0100
> Eric Dumazet writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
>>> guarantees (see the
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:40:06 +0100
> Eric Dumazet writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
>>> guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
>> guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
>> guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
>> ---
>>
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
> guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
> ---
>
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:42 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
> guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
> ---
> drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file
RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
---
drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
RCU_INIT_POINTER() is not suitable here as it doesn't give us ordering
guarantees (see the comment in rcupdate.h). This is also not a hotpath.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
---
drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
12 matches
Mail list logo