Re: [PATCH net-next V4 2/2] intel: ixgbevf: Support Windows hosts (Hyper-V)

2016-04-19 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:12 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path > as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary > adjustments to support Hyper-V. > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan >

Re: [PATCH net-next V4 2/2] intel: ixgbevf: Support Windows hosts (Hyper-V)

2016-04-19 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:12 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path > as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary > adjustments to support Hyper-V. > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan > --- > V2: Addressed most of the

[PATCH net-next V4 2/2] intel: ixgbevf: Support Windows hosts (Hyper-V)

2016-04-19 Thread K. Y. Srinivasan
On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary adjustments to support Hyper-V. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan --- V2: Addressed most of the comments from Alexander Duyck

[PATCH net-next V4 2/2] intel: ixgbevf: Support Windows hosts (Hyper-V)

2016-04-19 Thread K. Y. Srinivasan
On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary adjustments to support Hyper-V. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan --- V2: Addressed most of the comments from Alexander Duyck and Rustad, Mark