Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli writes:
> On 05/30/2017 11:33 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> The taggers are currently responsible to free the original SKB if they
>> made a copy of it, or in case of error.
>>
>> This patch simplifies this by freeing the original SKB in the
>>
Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli writes:
> On 05/30/2017 11:33 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> The taggers are currently responsible to free the original SKB if they
>> made a copy of it, or in case of error.
>>
>> This patch simplifies this by freeing the original SKB in the
>> dsa_slave_xmit
On 05/30/2017 11:33 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The taggers are currently responsible to free the original SKB if they
> made a copy of it, or in case of error.
>
> This patch simplifies this by freeing the original SKB in the
> dsa_slave_xmit caller, but only if an error (NULL) is returned.
Is
On 05/30/2017 11:33 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The taggers are currently responsible to free the original SKB if they
> made a copy of it, or in case of error.
>
> This patch simplifies this by freeing the original SKB in the
> dsa_slave_xmit caller, but only if an error (NULL) is returned.
Is
The taggers are currently responsible to free the original SKB if they
made a copy of it, or in case of error.
This patch simplifies this by freeing the original SKB in the
dsa_slave_xmit caller, but only if an error (NULL) is returned.
It is still the responsibility of the tagger to free the
The taggers are currently responsible to free the original SKB if they
made a copy of it, or in case of error.
This patch simplifies this by freeing the original SKB in the
dsa_slave_xmit caller, but only if an error (NULL) is returned.
It is still the responsibility of the tagger to free the
6 matches
Mail list logo