Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2]L2TP:Adjust intf MTU, add underlay L3, L2 hdrs

2017-03-17 Thread R Parameswaran
[Posting a v4 patch-set shortly based on additional code review comments received in internal review, please disregard the v3 patches] On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:33 PM, R. Parameswaran wrote: > > > In existing kernel code, when setting up the L2TP interface, all of the

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2]L2TP:Adjust intf MTU, add underlay L3, L2 hdrs

2017-03-17 Thread R Parameswaran
[Posting a v4 patch-set shortly based on additional code review comments received in internal review, please disregard the v3 patches] On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:33 PM, R. Parameswaran wrote: > > > In existing kernel code, when setting up the L2TP interface, all of the > tunnel encapsulation

[PATCH net-next v3 1/2]L2TP:Adjust intf MTU, add underlay L3, L2 hdrs

2017-03-16 Thread R. Parameswaran
In existing kernel code, when setting up the L2TP interface, all of the tunnel encapsulation headers are not taken into account when setting up the MTU on the L2TP logical interface device. Due to this, the packets created by the applications on top of the L2TP layer are larger than they ought

[PATCH net-next v3 1/2]L2TP:Adjust intf MTU, add underlay L3, L2 hdrs

2017-03-16 Thread R. Parameswaran
In existing kernel code, when setting up the L2TP interface, all of the tunnel encapsulation headers are not taken into account when setting up the MTU on the L2TP logical interface device. Due to this, the packets created by the applications on top of the L2TP layer are larger than they ought