On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 19:49 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> In order to avoid making code that deals with printing both, IPv4 and
> IPv6 addresses, unnecessary complicated as for example ...
Looks good to me.
Thanks Daniel for keeping at it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
In order to avoid making code that deals with printing both, IPv4 and
IPv6 addresses, unnecessary complicated as for example ...
if (sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
printk("... %pI6 ...", ..sin6_addr);
else
printk("... %pI4 ...", ..sin_addr.s_addr);
... it would be better to introduce a
In order to avoid making code that deals with printing both, IPv4 and
IPv6 addresses, unnecessary complicated as for example ...
if (sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
printk(... %pI6 ..., ..sin6_addr);
else
printk(... %pI4 ..., ..sin_addr.s_addr);
... it would be better to introduce a format
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 19:49 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
In order to avoid making code that deals with printing both, IPv4 and
IPv6 addresses, unnecessary complicated as for example ...
Looks good to me.
Thanks Daniel for keeping at it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
4 matches
Mail list logo