On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 3:29 PM Xie He wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 9:33 AM Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
> >
> > Should this still check data[5] == FR_PAD?
>
> No, the 6th byte (data[5]) is not a padding field. It is the first
> byte of the SNAP header. The original code is misleading. That
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 9:33 AM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> Should this still check data[5] == FR_PAD?
No, the 6th byte (data[5]) is not a padding field. It is the first
byte of the SNAP header. The original code is misleading. That is part
of the reasons why I want to fix it with this patch.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:32 PM Xie He wrote:
>
> Change the fr_rx function to make this driver support any Ethertype
> when receiving skbs on normal (non-Ethernet-emulating) PVC devices.
> (This driver is already able to handle any Ethertype when sending.)
>
> Originally in the fr_rx function,
Change the fr_rx function to make this driver support any Ethertype
when receiving skbs on normal (non-Ethernet-emulating) PVC devices.
(This driver is already able to handle any Ethertype when sending.)
Originally in the fr_rx function, the code that parses the long (10-byte)
header only
4 matches
Mail list logo
