On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 01:19 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> I don't know if the guest expects that slots for the same packet
> comes back at the same time.
I don't think the guest is allowed to assume that. In particular they
aren't allowed to assume the the slots will be freed in the order they
wer
On 20/02/14 09:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:54 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 19/02/14 10:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
This patch co
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:54:29PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 19/02/14 10:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> >>On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> This patch contains the new defi
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:54 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 19/02/14 10:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> >> On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> This patch contains the new definit
On 19/02/14 10:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
Is this just adding a bunch of (curre
On 18/02/14 17:24, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
+ spinlock_t dealloc_lock;
+ spinlock_t response_lock;
Please add comments to both of these describing what bits of the
datastructure they are locking.
You might find it is clearer to gro
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> >> This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
> >
> > Is this just adding a bunch of (currently) unused functions? Tha
On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
Is this just adding a bunch of (currently) unused functions? That's a
slightly odd way to structure a series. They don't seem to be
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>
> + spinlock_t dealloc_lock;
> + spinlock_t response_lock;
Please add comments to both of these describing what bits of the
datastructure they are locking.
You might find it is clearer to group the locks and the things they
pro
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
Is this just adding a bunch of (currently) unused functions? That's a
slightly odd way to structure a series. They don't seem to be "generic
helpers" or anything so it would
This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
v2:
- move unmapping to separate thread. The NAPI instance has to be scheduled
even from thread context, which can cause huge delays
- that causes unfortunately bigger struct xenvif
- store grant handle after checking validity
11 matches
Mail list logo
