On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 07:55:00AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:49:44 +0200 (CEST)
> Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> > Permanent hardware address of a network device was traditionally provided
> > via ethtool ioctl interface but as Jiri Pirko pointed out in a review of
> >
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:49:44 +0200 (CEST)
Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Permanent hardware address of a network device was traditionally provided
> via ethtool ioctl interface but as Jiri Pirko pointed out in a review of
> ethtool netlink interface, rtnetlink is much more suitable for it so let's
>
Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:49:44PM CEST, mkube...@suse.cz wrote:
>Permanent hardware address of a network device was traditionally provided
>via ethtool ioctl interface but as Jiri Pirko pointed out in a review of
>ethtool netlink interface, rtnetlink is much more suitable for it so let's
>add it to
Permanent hardware address of a network device was traditionally provided
via ethtool ioctl interface but as Jiri Pirko pointed out in a review of
ethtool netlink interface, rtnetlink is much more suitable for it so let's
add it to the RTM_NEWLINK message.
Add IFLA_PERM_ADDRESS attribute to
4 matches
Mail list logo