Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:27:46PM CEST, ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
>Hey Jiri,
>
>Actually, in the end I went with the suggestion from Andrew and Lukas,
>which is to follow Dan's guideline:
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/22/374 . It looks like this:
>
Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:27:46PM CEST, ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
>Hey Jiri,
>
>Actually, in the end I went with the suggestion from Andrew and Lukas,
>which is to follow Dan's guideline:
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/22/374 . It looks like this:
>
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:48 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Jason
>
> This is the sort of thing you should state in the patchset version
> history. It is O.K. to say i will address this later, but you need to
> communicate that. Otherwise reviewers just get frustrated that
> comments are
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:48 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Jason
>
> This is the sort of thing you should state in the patchset version
> history. It is O.K. to say i will address this later, but you need to
> communicate that. Otherwise reviewers just get frustrated that
> comments are
4 matches
Mail list logo
