On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Sathya Perla wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Tom Herbert [mailto:therb...@google.com]
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, David Miller
>>> wrote:
>>> > From: Joe Stringer
>>> > Date: Wed, 5
The inner headers are reset in iptunnel_handle_offloads. This called
in the xmit encapsulation function (GRE, fou, VXLAN, etc.) before
added in encapsulation headers, so the inner headers will point to the
encapsulation payload, i.e. the encapsulated packet. The headers are
only on the first encaps
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Joe Stringer
>> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:06:46 -0800
>>
>>> My impression was that the changes are more likely to be
>>> hardware-specific (like the i40e changes) rather than softwar
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Stringer
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:06:46 -0800
>
>> My impression was that the changes are more likely to be
>> hardware-specific (like the i40e changes) rather than software-specific,
>> like changes that might be integrated into t
From: Joe Stringer
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:06:46 -0800
> My impression was that the changes are more likely to be
> hardware-specific (like the i40e changes) rather than software-specific,
> like changes that might be integrated into the helper.
I think there is more commonality amongst hardwar
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:38:25PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Or Gerlitz
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:32:44 +0200
>
> > but fact is that the proposed patch series has the --same-- helper for
> > four drivers, so why not start with a that limited helper which would
> > be picked up by these
From: Or Gerlitz
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:32:44 +0200
> but fact is that the proposed patch series has the --same-- helper for
> four drivers, so why not start with a that limited helper which would
> be picked up by these drivers and we'll take it from there.
I'm in favor of the helper, duplica
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 5 November 2014 04:38, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Joe Stringer
>>> wrote:
>>> > Most NICs that report NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL support VXLAN, and not
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>
> On 5 November 2014 04:38, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> > Most NICs that report NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL support VXLAN, and not other
>> > UDP-based encapsulation protocols where the format an
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Most NICs that report NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL support VXLAN, and not other
> UDP-based encapsulation protocols where the format and size of the header may
> differ. This patch series implements ndo_gso_check() for these NICs,
> restricting the
Most NICs that report NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL support VXLAN, and not other
UDP-based encapsulation protocols where the format and size of the header may
differ. This patch series implements ndo_gso_check() for these NICs,
restricting the GSO handling to something that looks and smells like VXLAN.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
