Re: [PATCH net v1] net: dsa: ksz8795: use correct number of physical ports

2020-12-05 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
Jakub, Andrew, On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:24 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > All the port counts here are -1 compared to datasheets, so I'm assuming > the are not supposed to include the host facing port or something? > > Can you describe the exact problem you're trying to solve? > The ksz8795

Re: [PATCH net v1] net: dsa: ksz8795: use correct number of physical ports

2020-12-04 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:24:56PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:46:45 -0500 Sven Van Asbroeck wrote: > > From: Sven Van Asbroeck > > > > The ksz8795 has five physical ports, but the driver assumes > > it has only four. This prevents the driver from working correctly. > >

Re: [PATCH net v1] net: dsa: ksz8795: use correct number of physical ports

2020-12-04 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:46:45 -0500 Sven Van Asbroeck wrote: > From: Sven Van Asbroeck > > The ksz8795 has five physical ports, but the driver assumes > it has only four. This prevents the driver from working correctly. > > Fix by indicating the correct number of physical ports. > > Fixes:

Re: [PATCH net v1] net: dsa: ksz8795: use correct number of physical ports

2020-12-03 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 12/3/2020 1:46 PM, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote: > From: Sven Van Asbroeck > > The ksz8795 has five physical ports, but the driver assumes > it has only four. This prevents the driver from working correctly. > > Fix by indicating the correct number of physical ports. > > Fixes: e66f840c08a23

[PATCH net v1] net: dsa: ksz8795: use correct number of physical ports

2020-12-03 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
From: Sven Van Asbroeck The ksz8795 has five physical ports, but the driver assumes it has only four. This prevents the driver from working correctly. Fix by indicating the correct number of physical ports. Fixes: e66f840c08a23 ("net: dsa: ksz: Add Microchip KSZ8795 DSA driver") Tested-by: