On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Ok. Once I figure out what went wrong. This went through Feng's build
> > system and I though he did a powerpc build. So it must be a difference
> > configuration on powerpc.
>
> Were the patches tested on top of v3.17-rc1? My build was a powerpc
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Weird, the build-bot reported success on all powerpc configs on the
> percpu branches w/o the revert. I wonder what's going on.
I think this will fix it but I have no way of verifying it.
Subject: Define __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING to avoid duplicate
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:56:27 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Chrisoph, let's route the updated patch through powerpc tree.
>
> Ok. Once I figure out what went wrong. This went through Feng's build
> system and I though he did
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:43:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:26:09 -0400 Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > From 23f66e2d661b4d3226d16e25910a9e9472ce2410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Tejun Heo
> > Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:18:29 -0400
> >
> > This
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:26:09 -0400 Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> From 23f66e2d661b4d3226d16e25910a9e9472ce2410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tejun Heo
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:18:29 -0400
>
> This reverts commit 5828f666c069af74e00db21559f1535103c9f79a due to
> build failure after
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Chrisoph, let's route the updated patch through powerpc tree.
Ok. Once I figure out what went wrong. This went through Feng's build
system and I though he did a powerpc build. So it must be a difference
configuration on powerpc.
--
To unsubscribe from
>From 23f66e2d661b4d3226d16e25910a9e9472ce2410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:18:29 -0400
This reverts commit 5828f666c069af74e00db21559f1535103c9f79a due to
build failure after merging with pending powerpc changes.
Link:
From 23f66e2d661b4d3226d16e25910a9e9472ce2410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:18:29 -0400
This reverts commit 5828f666c069af74e00db21559f1535103c9f79a due to
build failure after merging with pending powerpc changes.
Link:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
Chrisoph, let's route the updated patch through powerpc tree.
Ok. Once I figure out what went wrong. This went through Feng's build
system and I though he did a powerpc build. So it must be a difference
configuration on powerpc.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:26:09 -0400 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
From 23f66e2d661b4d3226d16e25910a9e9472ce2410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:18:29 -0400
This reverts commit 5828f666c069af74e00db21559f1535103c9f79a due to
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:43:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:26:09 -0400 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
From 23f66e2d661b4d3226d16e25910a9e9472ce2410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:18:29 -0400
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:56:27 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
Chrisoph, let's route the updated patch through powerpc tree.
Ok. Once I figure out what went wrong. This went through Feng's build
system and I though
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
Weird, the build-bot reported success on all powerpc configs on the
percpu branches w/o the revert. I wonder what's going on.
I think this will fix it but I have no way of verifying it.
Subject: Define __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING to avoid duplicate defs
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Ok. Once I figure out what went wrong. This went through Feng's build
system and I though he did a powerpc build. So it must be a difference
configuration on powerpc.
Were the patches tested on top of v3.17-rc1? My build was a powerpc
14 matches
Mail list logo
