On 05/31/2016 07:09 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:00:16PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:30:53 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:22:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Sun, May 29, 2016
Em Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:01:28PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:10:20 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:54:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > Here is t
Em Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:00:16PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:30:53 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> > Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:22:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:10:20 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:54:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Hi Masami,
> >
> > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-
On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:30:53 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:22:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache
Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:22:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache and
> > initial SDT support.
>
> Ok, for completeness sake: Where does one l
Em Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache and
> initial SDT support.
Ok, for completeness sake: Where does one learn more about "SDT", I
couldn't find a description of this in this patchkit, /me goes goo
Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:54:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache and
> > initial SDT support.
> >
> > The previous version is here; https://
On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:54:58 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache and
> > initial SDT support.
> >
> > The previous version is here; https://lkml.org
Hi Masami,
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache and
> initial SDT support.
>
> The previous version is here; https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/14/107
>
> This version just fixes 2 points according to Hema
Hi,
Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache and
initial SDT support.
The previous version is here; https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/14/107
This version just fixes 2 points according to Hemant's comment,
and split out the filename__readable() patch.
Changes in v9:
- [1/16,2/16] sp
11 matches
Mail list logo