On Tuesday 30 October 2007 01:17, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Nick, Eric, Andrew,
>
> we now have passed rc1. That means that Erics or Nicks rd rewrite is no
> longer an option for 2.6.24. If I followed the last thread correctly all
> alternative patches have one of the following issue
> - too
Nick, Eric, Andrew,
we now have passed rc1. That means that Erics or Nicks rd rewrite is no longer
an option for 2.6.24. If I followed the last thread correctly all alternative
patches have one of the following issue
- too big for post rc1
- break reiserfs and maybe others
- call into vfs while
Nick, Eric, Andrew,
we now have passed rc1. That means that Erics or Nicks rd rewrite is no longer
an option for 2.6.24. If I followed the last thread correctly all alternative
patches have one of the following issue
- too big for post rc1
- break reiserfs and maybe others
- call into vfs while
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 01:17, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Nick, Eric, Andrew,
we now have passed rc1. That means that Erics or Nicks rd rewrite is no
longer an option for 2.6.24. If I followed the last thread correctly all
alternative patches have one of the following issue
- too big
4 matches
Mail list logo