On 2013/01/26 10:26, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> There is no backing store to tmpfs and file creation rules are the
> same as for any other filesystem so it is semantically safe to allow
> unprivileged users to mount it. ramfs is safe for the same reasons so
> allow either flavor of tmpfs to be
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com):
>
> There is no backing store to tmpfs and file creation rules are the
> same as for any other filesystem so it is semantically safe to allow
> unprivileged users to mount it. ramfs is safe for the same reasons so
> allow either flavor of tmpfs t
There is no backing store to tmpfs and file creation rules are the
same as for any other filesystem so it is semantically safe to allow
unprivileged users to mount it. ramfs is safe for the same reasons so
allow either flavor of tmpfs to be mounted by a user namespace root
user.
The memory contr
3 matches
Mail list logo