Hi Peter,
Sorry for delay in reply.
Please, wrap your emails at 78 - most mailers can do this.
Done.
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:05 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 18:38 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
List of commits
cpuisol: Make cpu isolatio
Please, wrap your emails at 78 - most mailers can do this.
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:05 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 18:38 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> >
> >> List of commits
> >>cpuisol: Make cpu isolation configrable and export isolat
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 08:38 -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
List of commits
cpuisol: Make cpu isolation configrable and export isolated map
cpu_isolated_map was a bad hack when it was introduced, I feel we should
deprecate it and fully integrate the functionality into
Mark Hounschell wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 18:38 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
As you suggested I'm sending CPU isolation patches for review/inclusion into
sched-devel tree. They are against 2.6.25-rc2.
You can also pull them from my GIT tree at
git://git.kern
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 18:38 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
As you suggested I'm sending CPU isolation patches for review/inclusion into
sched-devel tree. They are against 2.6.25-rc2.
You can also pull them from my GIT tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ker
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi Max,
[ ... ]
Last patch to the stop machine is potentially unsafe and is marked as
experimental. Unfortunately
it's currently the only option that allows dynamic module insertion/removal
for above scenarios.
I'm puzzled by the following part (can be a misunders
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 08:38 -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> >> List of commits
> >>cpuisol: Make cpu isolation configrable and export isolated map
> >
> > cpu_isolated_map was a bad hack when it was introduced, I feel we should
> > deprecate it and fully integrate the functionality into cpu
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 18:38 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
>
>> As you suggested I'm sending CPU isolation patches for review/inclusion into
>> sched-devel tree. They are against 2.6.25-rc2.
>> You can also pull them from my GIT tree at
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 18:38 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> As you suggested I'm sending CPU isolation patches for review/inclusion into
> sched-devel tree. They are against 2.6.25-rc2.
> You can also pull them from my GIT tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuis
Hi Max,
> [ ... ]
> Last patch to the stop machine is potentially unsafe and is marked as
> experimental. Unfortunately
> it's currently the only option that allows dynamic module insertion/removal
> for above scenarios.
I'm puzzled by the following part (can be a misunderstanding from my si
Ingo,
As you suggested I'm sending CPU isolation patches for review/inclusion into
sched-devel tree. They are against 2.6.25-rc2.
You can also pull them from my GIT tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git
master
Diffstat:
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/
11 matches
Mail list logo
