On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 08:01:37AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:07:50AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >>- On Nov 11, 2018, at 2:41 PM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 08:01:37AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:07:50AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Nov 11, 2018, at 2:41 PM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This series does additional cleanup for the RCU flavor consolidation,
> focus
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:07:50AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Nov 11, 2018, at 2:41 PM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > This series does additional cleanup for the RCU flavor consolidation,
> > focusing primarily on uses of old API members, for example, s
- On Nov 11, 2018, at 2:41 PM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This series does additional cleanup for the RCU flavor consolidation,
> focusing primarily on uses of old API members, for example, so that
> call_rcu_bh() becomes call_rcu(). There are also a few straggling
> i
Hello!
This series does additional cleanup for the RCU flavor consolidation,
focusing primarily on uses of old API members, for example, so that
call_rcu_bh() becomes call_rcu(). There are also a few straggling
internal-to-RCU cleanups.
1. Remove unused rcu_state externs, courtesy of Joel F
5 matches
Mail list logo