Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/8] RCU callback-numbering simplifications for 3.11

2013-04-13 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:32:11PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > This series takes advantage of callback numbering to simplify RCU's > grace-period machinery, in some cases also reducing the number of > lock acquisitions (though the resulting change in performance is not > perceptible). The

Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/8] RCU callback-numbering simplifications for 3.11

2013-04-13 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:32:11PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: This series takes advantage of callback numbering to simplify RCU's grace-period machinery, in some cases also reducing the number of lock acquisitions (though the resulting change in performance is not perceptible). The

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/8] RCU callback-numbering simplifications for 3.11

2013-04-12 Thread Paul E. McKenney
Hello! This series takes advantage of callback numbering to simplify RCU's grace-period machinery, in some cases also reducing the number of lock acquisitions (though the resulting change in performance is not perceptible). The individual patches are as follows: 1. Move code to make way

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/8] RCU callback-numbering simplifications for 3.11

2013-04-12 Thread Paul E. McKenney
Hello! This series takes advantage of callback numbering to simplify RCU's grace-period machinery, in some cases also reducing the number of lock acquisitions (though the resulting change in performance is not perceptible). The individual patches are as follows: 1. Move code to make way