From: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.ch...@linux.alibaba.com>

RCU triggerse the following sparse warning:

kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:1497:5: warning: symbol
'nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy' was not declared. Should it be static?

This commit therefore makes this variable static.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <ab...@linux.alibaba.com>
Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.ch...@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 93d3938..a1a17ad 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1556,7 +1556,7 @@ early_param("rcu_nocb_poll", parse_rcu_nocb_poll);
  * After all, the main point of bypassing is to avoid lock contention
  * on ->nocb_lock, which only can happen at high call_rcu() rates.
  */
-int nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy = 16 * 1000 / HZ;
+static int nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy = 16 * 1000 / HZ;
 module_param(nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy, int, 0);
 
 /*
-- 
2.9.5

Reply via email to