On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:42:13AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Minor nits below:
>
> Other than that Acked-by: Pranith Kumar
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andev wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney"
> >
> > Recent LKML discussings (see http://lwn.net/Articles/586838/ and
> >
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:42:13AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
Minor nits below:
Other than that Acked-by: Pranith Kumar bobby.pr...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andev debian...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Recent LKML discussings
Minor nits below:
Other than that Acked-by: Pranith Kumar
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andev wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney"
>
> Recent LKML discussings (see http://lwn.net/Articles/586838/ and
> http://lwn.net/Articles/588300/ for the LWN writeups) brought out
> some ways of misusing
From: "Paul E. McKenney"
Recent LKML discussings (see http://lwn.net/Articles/586838/ and
http://lwn.net/Articles/588300/ for the LWN writeups) brought out
some ways of misusing the return value from rcu_dereference() that
are not necessarily completely intuitive. This commit therefore
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Recent LKML discussings (see http://lwn.net/Articles/586838/ and
http://lwn.net/Articles/588300/ for the LWN writeups) brought out
some ways of misusing the return value from rcu_dereference() that
are not necessarily completely intuitive. This
Minor nits below:
Other than that Acked-by: Pranith Kumar bobby.pr...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andev debian...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Recent LKML discussings (see http://lwn.net/Articles/586838/ and
http://lwn.net/Articles/588300/
6 matches
Mail list logo