On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 05:18:37PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:19 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:19 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney"
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:24:17AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2013.01.07 at 09:16 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.01.07 at 09:16 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney"
On 2013.01.07 at 09:16 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > From: "Paul E. McKenney"
> > >
> > > It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes being out of
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > From: "Paul E. McKenney"
> > >
> > > It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney"
> >
> > It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes being out of bounds
> > unless it can prove otherwise. It gives this warning
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney"
>
> It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes being out of bounds
> unless it can prove otherwise. It gives this warning on some RCU
> initialization code. Because this is far from any fastpath,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes being out of bounds
unless it can prove otherwise. It gives this warning on some RCU
initialization code. Because this is far
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes being out of bounds
unless it can prove otherwise. It gives
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array
On 2013.01.07 at 09:16 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.01.07 at 09:16 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:24:17AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.01.07 at 09:16 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:19 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 05:18:37PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:19 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:36AM
From: "Paul E. McKenney"
It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes being out of bounds
unless it can prove otherwise. It gives this warning on some RCU
initialization code. Because this is far from any fastpath, add
an explicit check for array bounds and panic if so. This gives the
From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
It turns out that gcc 4.8 warns on array indexes being out of bounds
unless it can prove otherwise. It gives this warning on some RCU
initialization code. Because this is far from any fastpath, add
an explicit check for array bounds and panic if
18 matches
Mail list logo