Re: [PATCH v0] scripts/gdb: Use a generator instead of iterator for task list

On 2014-10-09 10:03, Daniel Wagner wrote: > The iterator does not return any task_struct from the thread_group list > because the first condition in the 'if not t or ...' will only be the > first time None. > > Instead of keeping track of the state ourself in the next() function, > we fall back us

[PATCH v0] scripts/gdb: Use a generator instead of iterator for task list

I am trying to debug something here and gave your patches a spin. I found a small issue when trying to access threads instead only processes. See you next week in Duesseldorf! Daniel Wagner (1): scripts/gdb: Use a generator instead of iterator for task list scripts/gdb/linux/tasks.py | 50 ++

[PATCH v0] scripts/gdb: Use a generator instead of iterator for task list

The iterator does not return any task_struct from the thread_group list because the first condition in the 'if not t or ...' will only be the first time None. Instead of keeping track of the state ourself in the next() function, we fall back using Python's generator. Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner