Hi Yongbo,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on asoc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v5.7-rc5 next-20200511]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base'
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:21:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 18:04:15 +0800, Yongbo Zhang wrote:
> > SSI BUSIF buffer is possible to overflow or underflow, especially in a
> > hypervisor environment. If there is no interrupt support, it will eventually
> > lead to errors in pcm
On Mon, 11 May 2020 18:04:15 +0800, Yongbo Zhang wrote:
> SSI BUSIF buffer is possible to overflow or underflow, especially in a
> hypervisor environment. If there is no interrupt support, it will eventually
> lead to errors in pcm data.
> This patch adds overflow and underflow interrupt support fo
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:04:15PM +0800, Yongbo Zhang wrote:
> SSI BUSIF buffer is possible to overflow or underflow, especially in a
> hypervisor environment. If there is no interrupt support, it will eventually
> lead to errors in pcm data.
> This patch adds overflow and underflow interrupt supp
SSI BUSIF buffer is possible to overflow or underflow, especially in a
hypervisor environment. If there is no interrupt support, it will eventually
lead to errors in pcm data.
This patch adds overflow and underflow interrupt support for SSI BUSIF buffer.
Reported-by: Chen Li
Signed-off-by: Yongbo
SSI BUSIF buffer is possible to overflow or underflow, especially in a
hypervisor environment. If there is no interrupt support, it will eventually
lead to errors in pcm data.
This patch adds overflow and underflow interrupt support for SSI BUSIF buffer.
Reported-by: Chen Li
Signed-off-by: Yongbo
6 matches
Mail list logo
