Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] MIPS: uasm: false warning on use of uasm_i_lui()

2020-09-14 Thread Jim Quinlan
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:37 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:45:06PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > Currently, the example uasm code > > > > uasm_i_lui(p, tmp, 0xa000); > > > > issues a warning at Linux boot when the code is "assembled". This is > > because the

Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] MIPS: uasm: false warning on use of uasm_i_lui()

2020-09-10 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:45:06PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > Currently, the example uasm code > > uasm_i_lui(p, tmp, 0xa000); > > issues a warning at Linux boot when the code is "assembled". This is > because the "lui" instruction is defined by the macro "Ip_u1s2(_lui)" -- I > believe

[RESEND PATCH v1] MIPS: uasm: false warning on use of uasm_i_lui()

2020-09-08 Thread Jim Quinlan
Currently, the example uasm code uasm_i_lui(p, tmp, 0xa000); issues a warning at Linux boot when the code is "assembled". This is because the "lui" instruction is defined by the macro "Ip_u1s2(_lui)" -- I believe it should be Ip_u1u2(_lui) -- and its definition is associated with the

[PATCH v1] MIPS: uasm: false warning on use of uasm_i_lui()

2020-08-07 Thread Jim Quinlan
Currently, the example uasm code uasm_i_lui(p, tmp, 0xa000); issues a warning at Linux boot when the code is "assembled". This is because the "lui" instruction is defined by the macro "Ip_u1s2(_lui)" -- I believe it should be Ip_u1u2(_lui) -- and its definition is associated with the