On Mon 2019-03-18 17:12:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:37:29AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Mon 2019-03-04 12:00:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> > > Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type inste
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:37:29AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2019-03-04 12:00:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> > Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek
Thanks!
On Mon 2019-03-04 12:00:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek
I have already sent pull request for 5.1
+Cc: Petr
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 12:00:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
> ---
> lib/test_printf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 fi
Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
lib/test_printf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_pri
5 matches
Mail list logo