Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Correct names of RESETS register bits

2018-06-03 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > According to documentation the function has 2 bits for reset > while iDMA 64-bit has only one. > > Rename it accordingly. Note, there is no functional change since > we always handle them together. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > drivers

Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Correct names of RESETS register bits

2018-06-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 13:26 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:05:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > According to documentation the function has 2 bits for reset > > while iDMA 64-bit has only one. > > > > Rename it accordingly. Note, there is no functional change since

Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Correct names of RESETS register bits

2018-04-25 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:05:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > According to documentation the function has 2 bits for reset > while iDMA 64-bit has only one. > > Rename it accordingly. Note, there is no functional change since > we always handle them together. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchen

[PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Correct names of RESETS register bits

2018-04-24 Thread Andy Shevchenko
According to documentation the function has 2 bits for reset while iDMA 64-bit has only one. Rename it accordingly. Note, there is no functional change since we always handle them together. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2