On Fri 03-08-18 14:59:34, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > On Fri 03-08-18 14:11:26, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM Zhaoyang Huang
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > for the soft_limit reclaim has more directivity than globa
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Fri 03-08-18 14:11:26, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM Zhaoyang Huang
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > for the soft_limit reclaim has more directivity than global reclaim,
> > > we40960
> > > have current memcg be skipped
On Fri 03-08-18 14:11:26, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> >
> > for the soft_limit reclaim has more directivity than global reclaim, we40960
> > have current memcg be skipped to avoid potential page thrashing.
> >
> The patch is tested in our android
On Fri 03-08-18 13:48:05, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> for the soft_limit reclaim has more directivity than global reclaim, we
> have current memcg be skipped to avoid potential page thrashing.
a) this changelog doesn't really explain the problem nor does it explain
why the proposed solution is reas
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
>
> for the soft_limit reclaim has more directivity than global reclaim, we40960
> have current memcg be skipped to avoid potential page thrashing.
>
The patch is tested in our android system with 2GB ram. The case
mainly focus on the smooth sl
for the soft_limit reclaim has more directivity than global reclaim, we
have current memcg be skipped to avoid potential page thrashing.
Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontr
6 matches
Mail list logo