Hi Bean,
On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 17:41 +0200, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 18:07 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> > Hi Bean,
> >
> > On 2020-08-06 17:50, Bean Huo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please check Stanley's recent change to ufshcd_abort, you may
> > > > want to rebase your change on his and do
On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 18:07 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> Hi Bean,
>
> On 2020-08-06 17:50, Bean Huo wrote:
> > >
> > > Please check Stanley's recent change to ufshcd_abort, you may
> > > want to rebase your change on his and do goto cleanup here.
> > > @Stanley correct me if I am wrong.
> > >
> > > B
Hi Bean,
On 2020-08-06 17:50, Bean Huo wrote:
Please check Stanley's recent change to ufshcd_abort, you may
want to rebase your change on his and do goto cleanup here.
@Stanley correct me if I am wrong.
But even if you do a goto cleanup here, we still lost the
chances to dump host infos/regs l
>
> Please check Stanley's recent change to ufshcd_abort, you may
> want to rebase your change on his and do goto cleanup here.
> @Stanley correct me if I am wrong.
>
> But even if you do a goto cleanup here, we still lost the
> chances to dump host infos/regs like it does in the old code.
> If
Hi Bean,
On 2020-08-04 20:35, Bean Huo wrote:
From: Bean Huo
If the bit corresponds to a task in the Doorbell register has been
cleared, no need to poll the status of the task on the device side
and to send an Abort Task TM.
This patch also deletes dispensable dev_err() in case of the task
alr
From: Bean Huo
If the bit corresponds to a task in the Doorbell register has been
cleared, no need to poll the status of the task on the device side
and to send an Abort Task TM.
This patch also deletes dispensable dev_err() in case of the task
already completed.
Signed-off-by: Bean Huo
---
dr
6 matches
Mail list logo
