On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:36:14PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
> and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put
> offline. Locking isn't needed because it protects atomic operation.
>
> # echo 0 | tee /
On 24/10/2018 11:44, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 10/24/18 1:20 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 21/10/2018 19:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
>>> and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put
>>> offline. Lo
On 10/24/18 1:20 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 21/10/2018 19:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
>> and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put
>> offline. Locking isn't needed because it protects atomic operat
On 21/10/2018 19:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
> and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put
> offline. Locking isn't needed because it protects atomic operation.
>
> # echo 0 | tee /sys/devices/system/
This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put
offline. Locking isn't needed because it protects atomic operation.
# echo 0 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[1-3]/online
BUG: sleeping function called from
5 matches
Mail list logo