On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 02:12:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:08 AM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:44:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:42 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > The only problem he
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:08 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:44:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:42 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
...
> > The only problem here, is that the 2nd is already in the Mark's tree
> > and he doesn't do rebases.
> >
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:44:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:42 PM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:37 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > If it's a bug that spi-topc
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:42 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:37 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > If it's a bug that spi-topcliff-pch.c disables but never enables
> > wakeup, I think this should turn into t
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:37 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> [+cc Rafael, in case you can clear up our wakeup confusion]
> original patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200720155714.714114-1-vaibhavgupt...@gmail.com
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 2
[+cc Rafael, in case you can clear up our wakeup confusion]
original patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200720155714.714114-1-vaibhavgupt...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 6:17 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 202
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 6:17 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:51:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:31 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> > wrote:
...
> > > + device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> >
> > Here I left a result. Care to explain (and perhaps send a f
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:51:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:31 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Drivers using legacy PM have to manage PCI states and device's PM states
> > themselves. They also need to take care of configuration registers.
> >
> > With improved
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:31 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
>
> Drivers using legacy PM have to manage PCI states and device's PM states
> themselves. They also need to take care of configuration registers.
>
> With improved and powerful support of generic PM, PCI Core takes care of
> above mentioned, de
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:45:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 21:27:15 +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> > Drivers using legacy PM have to manage PCI states and device's PM states
> > themselves. They also need to take care of configuration registers.
> >
> > With improved and powe
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 21:27:15 +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> Drivers using legacy PM have to manage PCI states and device's PM states
> themselves. They also need to take care of configuration registers.
>
> With improved and powerful support of generic PM, PCI Core takes care of
> above mentioned,
Drivers using legacy PM have to manage PCI states and device's PM states
themselves. They also need to take care of configuration registers.
With improved and powerful support of generic PM, PCI Core takes care of
above mentioned, device-independent, jobs.
This driver makes use of PCI helper func
12 matches
Mail list logo
