On 11/30/2015 06:20 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:12:22PM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 11/30/2015 05:16 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
I run through your code and as far as I understand above is not exactly
true. Your patch allows
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:12:22PM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 11/30/2015 05:16 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> >On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> >
> I run through your code and as far as I understand above is not exactly
> true. Your patch allows only to prevent users
On 11/30/2015 05:16 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
I run through your code and as far as I understand above is not exactly
true. Your patch allows only to prevent userspace from accessing interfaces
which has kernel drivers, there is no way to stop an appl
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> >> I run through your code and as far as I understand above is not exactly
> >> true. Your patch allows only to prevent userspace from accessing interfaces
> >> which has kernel drivers, there is no way to stop an application from
> >> taking
> >> c
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 18:39 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Yes, it's tough, I know, good luck.
>
> Also deal with multiple devices, busses that are ordered differently
> depending on the phase of the moon, and other fun things with dynamic
> devices and ioctls. It's a loosing battle :)
IMHO the fundame
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2015 06:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:19:29AM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 11/25/2015 04:45 PM, Emilio López wrote:
> >>>Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>>This patch introduces a new
On 11/26/2015 06:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:19:29AM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 11/25/2015 04:45 PM, Emilio López wrote:
Hi everyone,
This patch introduces a new ioctl, USBDEVFS_DROP_PRIVILEGES,
to voluntarily forgo the ability to issue ioctls which may
interfe
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:19:29AM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 11/25/2015 04:45 PM, Emilio López wrote:
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >This patch introduces a new ioctl, USBDEVFS_DROP_PRIVILEGES,
> >to voluntarily forgo the ability to issue ioctls which may
> >interfere with other users of t
On 11/25/2015 04:45 PM, Emilio López wrote:
Hi everyone,
This patch introduces a new ioctl, USBDEVFS_DROP_PRIVILEGES,
to voluntarily forgo the ability to issue ioctls which may
interfere with other users of the USB device.
This feature allows a privileged process (in the case of Chrome OS,
pe
Hi everyone,
This patch introduces a new ioctl, USBDEVFS_DROP_PRIVILEGES,
to voluntarily forgo the ability to issue ioctls which may
interfere with other users of the USB device.
This feature allows a privileged process (in the case of Chrome OS,
permission_broker) to open a USB device node and t
10 matches
Mail list logo