Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] module params: few simplifications

2015-04-21 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 04/21/15 01:30, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: Suspect the subject line is screwed up here and should have been "[PATCH v1 1/6] ". Regards, Arend Most code already uses consts for the struct kernel_param_ops, sweep the kernel for the last offending stragglers. Other than include/linux/modul

[PATCH v1 0/6] module params: few simplifications

2015-04-20 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Most code already uses consts for the struct kernel_param_ops, sweep the kernel for the last offending stragglers. Other than include/linux/moduleparam.h and kernel/params.c all other changes were generated with the following Coccinelle SmPL patch. Merge conflicts between trees can be handled with

[PATCH v1 0/6] module params: few simplifications

2015-04-20 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Here are a few simplifications on the sig_force module parameter code. I'm digging through this as long term I'd like enable standard use of the crypto code for module loading for firmware loading and later any file requested (non firmware) to replace udev deamons such a