On 06/11/2020 10:36, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
Hi Saravana,
Thank you for working on this !
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:23:37PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
tries t
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Saravana,
>
> Thank you for working on this !
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:23:37PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
> > tries to get away without creating fwnode
Hi Saravana,
Thank you for working on this !
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:23:37PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
> tries to get away without creating fwnode links in the name of saving
> memory usage. Past attempts to optimize
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 3:23 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
> tries to get away without creating fwnode links in the name of saving
> memory usage. Past attempts to optimize runtime at the cost of memory
> usage were blocked wit
The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
tries to get away without creating fwnode links in the name of saving
memory usage. Past attempts to optimize runtime at the cost of memory
usage were blocked with request for data showing that the optimization
made significant
5 matches
Mail list logo
